Go Back   Dallas Fort Worth Urban Forum > ll Metropolypse Now > Urban Development
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Calendar Facebook New Posts Mark Forums Read

Guests can search the DFWU Forum below:



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2005, 10:46 AM   #351
St-T
-
 
St-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Back to Lakewood
Posts: 3,399
We should be more upset with the zoning & planning commission and not the developer. I thought we had zoning laws so that Dallas would not look like Houston!
St-T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 10:48 AM   #352
Tnekster
Mile-High Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,532
^The next time he tries to build something this pathetic we should take a stand.
Tnekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2005, 01:03 AM   #353
incrediculous
Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,425
Send a message via AIM to incrediculous
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestTexan
If the economics of the deal change that dramatically in just 5 years, sounds like Schafer will be the big winner in the deal.

If I'm remembering the right project, this deal was passed around for a while looking for financing. It could be that the scope was scaled back significantly for easier financing. If that's the case, too bad there was not more patient money involved. This deal is a real throw-away.


He could very well see that land as a capital investment not yet primed. Rather than sit around and lose money for five years while waiting for his investment to mature, why not whip up some plaster walls and earn a little income in the mean time?

Granted, there's no way in hell you could admit that to anyone, especially with tenants listening.
incrediculous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2005, 04:33 AM   #354
1999McKinneyAve
Mid-Rise Member
 
1999McKinneyAve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 425
Look at it this way. Compared to the Dickeys BBQ/Overpriced gas station, it doesnt look all that bad! In reality, the two east corners of McKinney Ave and Routh/Maple are the most hideous for miles around...
1999McKinneyAve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2005, 07:31 AM   #355
BigD5349
Supertall Skyscraper Member
 
BigD5349's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uptown
Posts: 2,542
Yes, that whole intersection needs an overhaul. I would really be surprised if something wasn't cooking with that huge parking area behind Trulucks and the gas station.

That doesn't make me like Shafer's any better.
BigD5349 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2005, 08:56 AM   #356
BigD5349
Supertall Skyscraper Member
 
BigD5349's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uptown
Posts: 2,542
You know, sometimes you get an itch and have to keep scratching it. I know a lot of you don't think Dallas and pedestrian go in the same sentence, and you're mostly right, but we often don't make simple accommodations to allow the two worlds of transit to peacefully co-exist. So, it's time to nitpick on Shafer some more!

In the first picture, you will see the latest addition, a drive-through bank window. It's a trashy, low cost add-on that looks like a trashy, low cost add-on. This is the side of the building facing Maple-Routh.

Now, if as a pedestrian, I approach this building at McKinney & Pearl, I will see the landscaping. See picture 2. Nice, right? Well, the entire property is lined with bushes and in places, concrete escarpments. If I want to walk onto the property, I can do that two ways... I can cut through the bushes and take a big step up over the concrete ledge and onto the parking lot, and navigate throught parked cars, or, I can walk down the length of the building and go in where the cars go in, at the driveway, picture 3.

Look, I know this is not the end of the world, but I find it irritating that this idiot cannot make the most simple accommodation and put some entry points for walkers.

I intend to trample through the bushes, as I am sure most people will. If it's muddy, I hope I don't track the mud into any of the establishments there. But no promises.

I hate this development.

There were several nights this fall when McKinney Avenue was all we ever hoped for -- every outdoor cafe was filled with people, you could hear music playing in several places, people watching college football games, etc. People were *actually walking*, as was I. During that time of year, the weather is outstanding. On some of these nights, you don't want to be in a car! This, I thought, was why I moved here.

Dallas, like any other city, has it's walking seasons -- Spring, early Summer, Fall, and we get plenty of good nights in the early and late winter.

I've lived in the burbs most of my life. The reason I moved to uptown is that I was looking for something different. Where is our planning commissioner, Neal Emmons? Angela Hunt, where do you stand on this? What is the plan to make sure that developments are more urban than suburban?

I'm watching the developments come up on McKinney Ave, and I think the area is at a tipping point. McKinney Ave today is somewhat differentiated from other places in the Dallas area, pedestrian oriented in places, a bricked roadway with a trolley. It actually has some street energy in the evenings. If it becomes lined with isolated developments where the car rules by itself, then I'm interested in going somewhere else. There at least has to be a balance.
BigD5349 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2005, 09:06 AM   #357
WestTexan
Pragmatic Metropolist
 
WestTexan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 531
^Well put. This developement represents a monumental failure by everyone involved. Although easy walking distance to my office, I don't anticipate patronizing any of its tenants.
WestTexan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 12:18 AM   #358
drumguy8800
dallacentric
 
drumguy8800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 75154
Posts: 3,760
Send a message via AIM to drumguy8800 Send a message via MSN to drumguy8800
Oh my gosh quit whining everyone, its just like Highland Park Village. Not everything has to have apartments on top, and at least they have some underground parking. It's over. It's done. So cry about it.
__________________
[ xvisionx.com 13 - my photo gallery + journal ] - be sure to check out my new interactive downtown dallas picture map.
drumguy8800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 02:32 AM   #359
eburress
Low-Rise Member
 
eburress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumguy8800
Oh my gosh quit whining everyone, its just like Highland Park Village. Not everything has to have apartments on top, and at least they have some underground parking. It's over. It's done. So cry about it.


Uptown Village is far from being "just like Highland Park Village." Not to get into Highland Park Village's superior quality and/or aesthetics, unlike Uptown Village, it was actually built in a suburban area. Highland Park Village looks suburban because it was (and is) suburban.

In other news, some might find this funny...

I pasted everything everyone in this thread has said about Uptown Village into an email and sent it to Steve Shafer (Principal/CEO/President), Jay C. Harrison (Chief Financial Officer), David P. McNeil (Executive Vice President ), Corey Wade Duhon (Vice President of Leasing), and Ryan C. Shafer (Broker/Development Associate). I'll post whatever replies they send when/if I receive them.

I don't live in Dallas anymore but I travel there on business quite a bit and still pay attention to what's going on. Every time I pass that TOTAL PIECE OF $HIT development, I really want to throw up. With all of the amazing things happening in Dallas, it is an absolute crime that Shafer did what he/they did to such a prime piece of real estate.
eburress is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 08:19 AM   #360
tamtagon
Administrator
 
tamtagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta - Dallas
Posts: 9,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by eburress
With all of the amazing things happening in Dallas, it is an absolute crime that Shafer did what he/they did to such a prime piece of real estate.


And, some really nice Live Oak trees were growing on the property when the Salvation Army office was there. Sure would have been nice for those trees to still be there.
tamtagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 08:40 AM   #361
Boredkid
Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestTexan
^Well put. This developement represents a monumental failure by everyone involved. Although easy walking distance to my office, I don't anticipate patronizing any of its tenants.


This area, while could have been nicer, brings much needed assets to the area. Not every thing can be a nice highrise. People need to eat, get dry cleaning and many other things. Many of which can be done here. Hopefully over time, as you guys get used to it, you will stop complaining.
Boredkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 08:59 AM   #362
BigD5349
Supertall Skyscraper Member
 
BigD5349's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uptown
Posts: 2,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumguy8800
Oh my gosh quit whining everyone, its just like Highland Park Village. Not everything has to have apartments on top, and at least they have some underground parking. It's over. It's done. So cry about it.


Sorry, I'm going to keep saying it. What I am after is that Dallas develop this as more of an urban neighborhood.

I know the battle over this particular property is over -- there it sits, there's nothing I or anyone else can do about it. But I live here and I came here for a reason. This isn't Glenn Heights, or Plano, or Frisco. This is on McKinney Avenue, the Main Street of Uptown; one block away from the Arts District. No, I will not shut up.
BigD5349 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 09:16 AM   #363
Boredkid
Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,608
If you feel that stongly about it, buy it and build something you would rather have there.
Boredkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 09:35 AM   #364
1999McKinneyAve
Mid-Rise Member
 
1999McKinneyAve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 425
I think what it truly represents is that Schafer has zero architectual talent, or simply doesn't give a flip. It's not just Uptown Plaza...its also the strip center they built on McKinney (former fabric store location) and Knox Plaza at Knox-Henderson and 75. What's funny (in a sad way) is how they keep adding stuff to Uptown Plaza. One day it's blue awnings, then it's a bank drive-thru afterthought, then it's landscaping from Home Depot's reject section, and finally clearance poles that sit at every entrance. Reminds me of Mr. Potato Head and how it doesn't matter what pieces you add to the main piece, it's always going to be a potato.
1999McKinneyAve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 12:54 PM   #365
Milkman Dan
Dallas Fan
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: East Dallas
Posts: 582
I wonder how many of the people who are bitching about this development have actually done ANYTHING constructive besides posting on a message board. GO TO THE CITY WEBSITE, GET SOME NAMES AND ADDRESSES AND CALL / WRITE THE COUNCILPERSON AND P&Z PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS AREA. Hint: The 2 who should be getting the most calls / letters / emails are named above in the thread.

Posting rants on a message board is the most worthless waste of time and unproductive activity known to man in order to solve a problem. Sometimes I think people are actually replacing real life with bulletin board posts.

And as far as emailing Shafer - Just don't go to any of the stores. Emailing all of them will do nothing. Except cause them to laugh their way to the bank, which is exactly what I'd be doing.
Milkman Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 01:15 PM   #366
tamtagon
Administrator
 
tamtagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta - Dallas
Posts: 9,782
^Personally, I dont expect that corner to look like that in five years. As the neighborhood population grows pushing up the percentage of walk-up customers, Schafer should easily get a variance to build somethign replacing the surface parking.

??How easily and quickly could additional underground parking get built??

In the mean time, it's better than nothing regardless of how bad it looks. If that neighborhood continues to get swanky, no one will want to go to Pei Wei because it's in the ugly strip center polluting the ultra-luxury urban neighborhood.

This place is just a placeholder as I see it.
tamtagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 02:35 PM   #367
msutton
Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Paris / Manhattan / Dallas
Posts: 1,589
Send a message via AIM to msutton
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milkman Dan
I wonder how many of the people who are bitching about this development have actually done ANYTHING constructive besides posting on a message board. GO TO THE CITY WEBSITE, GET SOME NAMES AND ADDRESSES AND CALL / WRITE THE COUNCILPERSON AND P&Z PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS AREA. Hint: The 2 who should be getting the most calls / letters / emails are named above in the thread.

Posting rants on a message board is the most worthless waste of time and unproductive activity known to man in order to solve a problem. Sometimes I think people are actually replacing real life with bulletin board posts.

And as far as emailing Shafer - Just don't go to any of the stores. Emailing all of them will do nothing. Except cause them to laugh their way to the bank, which is exactly what I'd be doing.

well put
msutton is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 10:13 PM   #368
Razorback
#9 on Forbes Best Places
 
Razorback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fayetteville F#@king Arkansas
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamtagon
^Personally, I dont expect that corner to look like that in five years. As the neighborhood population grows pushing up the percentage of walk-up customers, Schafer should easily get a variance to build somethign replacing the surface parking.

??How easily and quickly could additional underground parking get built??

In the mean time, it's better than nothing regardless of how bad it looks. If that neighborhood continues to get swanky, no one will want to go to Pei Wei because it's in the ugly strip center polluting the ultra-luxury urban neighborhood.

This place is just a placeholder as I see it.


First, does Shafer do ANYTHING besides crappy strip malls?

It will take longer than 5 years. I guarantee that all of those tenants are locked into leases for at least five years, some maybe ten. As long as Shafer is collecting rents sufficient to pay the note associated with this property, I doubt anything will happen. An increase in property taxes won't spur it because the rents are likely NNN leases and those increases are passed along to the tenants anyway, with no net loss to Shafer.

It will take an outside entity coming in and bidding up the property beyond what they spent building this strip center and making an offer to offset any damages any of the existing tenants can claim because of their forced relocation.

If property values and density increase within the next four years to make the speculators come out looking for opportunities to redevelop properties like this, then its a possibility. I'm afraid we're stuck with this thing for at least 8-10 years.
Razorback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2005, 10:59 PM   #369
1999McKinneyAve
Mid-Rise Member
 
1999McKinneyAve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 425
Milkman, I can only speak for myself, but I have sat in more neighborhood meetings, City Planning meetings, homeowners associations, sat on the HOA board, and returned more blue forms back to the city than I care to remember. Three and a half years ago I scraped together every penny I could find to become an owner on LoMac, well before Victory, the Ritz, the Ashton, etc. were ever announced. So I do more than just post comments on here, I am very involved in the area and in 2002 invested my life savings into the faith that Uptown would thrive. I'm sure others on here are just as involved with the area as I am. Can you say the same?
1999McKinneyAve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 07:58 AM   #370
Columbus Civil
LH Copycat
 
Columbus Civil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LH
Posts: 5,537
Send a message via AIM to Columbus Civil
Quote:
Sometimes I think people are actually replacing real life with bulletin board posts.


guilty
__________________
Dallas uber alles
Columbus Civil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 09:26 AM   #371
carousel
Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestTexan
^Well put. This developement represents a monumental failure by everyone involved. Although easy walking distance to my office, I don't anticipate patronizing any of its tenants.



I agree w/ you in spirit (about not supporting the tenants). The plaza fell way short considering its location. However, you are fighting a losing battle. These tenants will flourish (especially good ole Pei Wei). Let's pray on bended knee that Mr. Schafer takes his boxes elsewhere.
carousel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 09:40 AM   #372
Tnekster
Mile-High Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,532
^I agree this corner will do exceptionally well once it opens. I also think the only coarse of action in the future is to fight much harder when we know Schafer is involved. But I hope he just moves on to the suburbs.
Tnekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 10:14 AM   #373
St-T
-
 
St-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Back to Lakewood
Posts: 3,399
I'm sure it will do fine--just like the friggin Uptown Wal-Mart is always packed. I live in the supposed "urban master-planned" neighborhood of State-Thomas... on one entry we have the very suburban Wal-Mart--on the other entry of the hood we have the cheap looking Shaffer Center. Both will do well because they give the neighbors something they need. But, it would have been so much astatically pleasing to have developments that "fit" more into the neighborhood.
St-T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 11:36 AM   #374
Milkman Dan
Dallas Fan
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: East Dallas
Posts: 582
Quote:
I'm sure others on here are just as involved with the area as I am. Can you say the same?
I don't live in uptown, however I spend a good deal of time of McKinney Ave for work. I am not trying to accuse you or anyone else of not doing enough for the area - I am not taking a side on the development at all, however the incessant griping via the message board is a waste of time... that was my only point.

I applaud your efforts to improve your surroundings and increase the quality of life for everyone around you (as you perceive it). If you could have got more people to do the same during the design / permitting process, this might have all been avoided. As it stands now - a moot point like drumguy said. Maybe this lesson will prepare others for future fights.

As an aside, I wonder if Shafer gave much in the way of campaign contributions to anyone over the last year(s)...? Is this a job for Jim Shultze?
Milkman Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 03:55 PM   #375
eburress
Low-Rise Member
 
eburress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 148
Corey Duhon's (Shafer Property Company Vice President of Leasing) reply to my email. Ouch...he really told me.

"There are always two sides to every argument. I lived in Uptown for five years and look forward to the growth and expansion of the neighborhood. Providing quality retail, restaurants and services to the Uptown community is our number one goal. In order to achieve such a goal, there are certain guidelines that developers must follow in order to abide by the City of Dallas ordinances. One of those ordinances pertains to parking requirements for vehicles. Yes, vehicles. People still drive in Dallas. If you ignore that fact as a retail developer in Dallas, then you will soon find yourself out of a job. Even in Uptown, shopping center developers must use the exact same parking requirements as they would for a shopping center in far North Dallas. You can clearly observe what happens to certain areas of Dallas that lack convenient parking. For those of you who criticize, where were you when city officials approved the building design and architecture? This is your neighborhood, there were several opportunities for you to make suggestions at city meetings or to give me a call while we were in our design stage. My sign was up for six months before we started construction. The actual building materials used are original Ludiuici tile, real stucco and real stone. We spent three times as much as we have ever spent on any retail building. Furthermore, the building is not complete, there are more design elements that will enhance the appearance of the building to come. Please, just give the building a chance. Being across from the Crescent is a hard act to follow, without a doubt the Crescent is the most elegant office building in the Southern United States. All we are trying to do is provide a place for those that office in the Crescent to grab Pad Thai at Pei Wei, or a Potbelly's sandwich for lunch, and maybe a nice dinner at Grotto later that night.

But honestly, can't you find something better to do on a Saturday night than writing an e-mail criticizing a shopping center?

Corey Duhon"


Any thoughts?
eburress is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 04:03 PM   #376
Kelley USA
Supertall Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,240
Well the guy does make a good point- the sign was posted at the site forever... And I guess Potbelly must be a new addition for the center- never saw them mentioned before.
Kelley USA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 04:03 PM   #377
Razorback
#9 on Forbes Best Places
 
Razorback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fayetteville F#@king Arkansas
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by eburress
Corey Duhon's (Shafer Property Company Vice President of Leasing) reply to my email. Ouch...he really told me.

"There are always two sides to every argument. I lived in Uptown for five years and look forward to the growth and expansion of the neighborhood. Maximizing our rents and leased area without regard to the overall development of the Uptown community is our number one goal. In order to achieve such a goal, there are certain guidelines that developers must follow in order to abide by the City of Dallas ordinances. One of those ordinances pertains to parking requirements for vehicles. Yes, vehicles. People still drive in Dallas. If you ignore that fact as a retail developer in Dallas, then you will soon find yourself out of a job. Even in Uptown, shopping center developers must use the exact same parking requirements as they would for a shopping center in far North Dallas. We believe parking only belongs in the front of buildings, never behind or below. In fact, our arms were twisted or we wouldn't have provided underground parking. You can clearly observe what happens to certain areas of Dallas that lack convenient parking. For those of you who criticize, where were you when city officials approved the building design and architecture? Who needs a coherent streetscape when there is money to be made at drive thrus? This is your neighborhood, there were several opportunities for you to make suggestions at city meetings or to give me a call while we were in our design stage. My sign was up for six months before we started construction. The actual building materials used are original Ludiuici tile, real stucco and real stone. We spent three times as much as we have ever spent on any of our other crappy retail buildings. Furthermore, the building is not complete, there are more design elements that will enhance the appearance of the building to come. Heck, we might even be tempted to put a clock face on once the fast food rents start hitting our accounts (but don't hold your breath. Please, just give the building a chance. Being across from the Crescent is a hard act to follow, without a doubt the Crescent is the most elegant office building in the Southern United States. That is why, for obvious reasons, we chose to build a strip mall directly across from it. Duh! All we are trying to do is provide a place for those that office in the Crescent to grab Pad Thai at Pei Wei, or a Potbelly's sandwich for lunch, and maybe a nice dinner at Grotto later that night, all the while maximizing our profits and minimizing our overhead.

But honestly, can't you find something better to do on a Saturday night than writing an e-mail criticizing a shopping center? Get out there and get some of that delicious Pad Tai, loser!

Corey Duhon"


Any thoughts?


Yes. Shafer properties is either a Turd Sandwich or a Giant Douche. I haven't decided...

Last edited by Razorback : 12-13-2005 at 04:13 PM.
Razorback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 04:08 PM   #378
Tnekster
Mile-High Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,532
^I heard something about that parking situation recently. I think the developers of West Village faced a similar challenge when trying to develop that property, they all do. Obviously they arrived at a different solution than Shafer did. I also remember something about that particular requirement being changed at some point in the future to allow easier development of mixed used projects. I think I heard this from the guy that spoke at our awards ceremony from the City of Dallas Economic Development office. I know the city is very aware of the problem, it takes a very patient yet persistant developer to make it happen the way they want/need.
Tnekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 04:20 PM   #379
Columbus Civil
LH Copycat
 
Columbus Civil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LH
Posts: 5,537
Send a message via AIM to Columbus Civil
You should fault the City for not having specific guidelines to take the phantom pedestrians into account. You can't expect all developers to go out of their way to design something to fit some tree hugging new urbanists definition of good design. Developers do what they do to make money. If some go out of their way to incorporate design elements that ignore the transportation choice made by 99% of Dallasites, then good for them I guess.
__________________
Dallas uber alles
Columbus Civil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 04:22 PM   #380
Lakewooder
Lakewooder
 
Lakewooder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lakewood - Junius Heights
Posts: 5,065
"real stucco" !

Oh gosh I am now completely contrite!
Lakewooder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 04:48 PM   #381
Razorback
#9 on Forbes Best Places
 
Razorback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fayetteville F#@king Arkansas
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Columbus Civil
You should fault the City for not having specific guidelines to take the phantom pedestrians into account. You can't expect all developers to go out of their way to design something to fit some tree hugging new urbanists definition of good design. Developers do what they do to make money. If some go out of their way to incorporate design elements that ignore the transportation choice made by 99% of Dallasites, then good for them I guess.


Tis true. Many a planning code was established for primarily suburban style development and does not address properly the needs of an urban environment.

Different design and code requirements for different parts of the city.

Or we could emulate our ugly stepsister to the south and chuck all planning out the winder...
Razorback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 05:45 PM   #382
drumguy8800
dallacentric
 
drumguy8800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 75154
Posts: 3,760
Send a message via AIM to drumguy8800 Send a message via MSN to drumguy8800
I was about to mention Houston. Just got back and actually I couldn't even tell that there was a lack of zoning and stuff. The city seemed to flow well.

I like how they have an actual separation between their "up"- and "down"- towns..
__________________
[ xvisionx.com 13 - my photo gallery + journal ] - be sure to check out my new interactive downtown dallas picture map.
drumguy8800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 05:56 PM   #383
St-T
-
 
St-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Back to Lakewood
Posts: 3,399
Well, drive down Westheimer-- church, porno store, day care, church, liquor store.....

nice zoning! ...or lack there of!
St-T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 06:01 PM   #384
Tnekster
Mile-High Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,532
How do they deal with urban development options down there? It seems like thier stand on zoning would really complicate the issue.
Tnekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 06:06 PM   #385
St-T
-
 
St-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Back to Lakewood
Posts: 3,399
You can have a high rise anywhere--or a little strip mall anywhere... I think the idea is that land values will dictate land use.
St-T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 06:55 PM   #386
Bryant
live your dreams
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumguy8800
I like how they have an actual separation between their "up"- and "down"- towns..


Heretic!
Bryant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 07:43 PM   #387
rjlevins
Austinite
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin
Posts: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by St-T
Well, drive down Westheimer-- church, porno store, day care, church, liquor store.....

nice zoning! ...or lack there of!


I know what you mean. I'm always concerned when I see a day care next to a church. After becoming a part of the planning process in Austin, it does not surprise me how these things are overlooked.

euburress, thank you for posting that response. It's clear that Shafer Property Company is only aiming to do the bare minimum. You might want to forward that on to city staff. I know I'll keep it in mind if I ever see their name pop up down here.
__________________
http://austinforum.net
rjlevins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 12:17 PM   #388
St-T
-
 
St-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Back to Lakewood
Posts: 3,399
I think the building is awful----but, I would have been cool if they would have pushed the footprint to the street and had all the parking in the rear... the very minimum!
St-T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 12:24 PM   #389
Boredkid
Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,608
But then people might have to walk...
Boredkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 12:25 PM   #390
30kmillionaire
Up and Coming Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 49
Anyone know when Pei Wei opens?
30kmillionaire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 09:08 PM   #391
SMU Urban
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 22
I would like to second Drumguy about Houston. I was at a mixed use conference there earlier this week and the cities look the same. Apparently they still have setbacks, variances and other design codes, just no land use codes. And I've never been down Westheimer, but what you described about liquor store next to a church, etc. wouldn't be allowed under state law. The way I understand it, you can not have a place that sells or consumes alcohol within a certain distance of a church.
SMU Urban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2005, 09:02 AM   #392
Boredkid
Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,608
Dont people consume alcohol in churches though?
Boredkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2005, 09:06 AM   #393
Columbus Civil
LH Copycat
 
Columbus Civil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LH
Posts: 5,537
Send a message via AIM to Columbus Civil
Catholics don't.
__________________
Dallas uber alles
Columbus Civil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2005, 09:13 AM   #394
Boredkid
Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,608
nm, once its consumed it becomes Jesus's blood.
Boredkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2005, 09:20 AM   #395
Columbus Civil
LH Copycat
 
Columbus Civil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LH
Posts: 5,537
Send a message via AIM to Columbus Civil
It becomes Christ's blood during transubstantiation..before consumption.
__________________
Dallas uber alles
Columbus Civil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2005, 09:22 AM   #396
Boredkid
Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,608
opps, thanks for clarifying.
Boredkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2005, 02:58 PM   #397
BigD5349
Supertall Skyscraper Member
 
BigD5349's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uptown
Posts: 2,542
There's an article in today's paper: "New urbanism is picking up steam in Duncanville; Work on downtown offices, town houses to start in spring..."

For all you Pei Wei fiends out there, it is now open at Shafer's Uptown Plaza. Maybe the Morning News can announce the opening with the following story: "Old suburbanism like splash of cold water in Uptown" ...
BigD5349 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2005, 03:37 PM   #398
Tnekster
Mile-High Skyscraper Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigD5349
There's an article in today's paper: "New urbanism is picking up steam in Duncanville; Work on downtown offices, town houses to start in spring..."



What section was that in?
Tnekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2005, 04:57 PM   #399
BigD5349
Supertall Skyscraper Member
 
BigD5349's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uptown
Posts: 2,542
Metro page 8. I'd post it here, but it probably belongs in a different thread.
BigD5349 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2005, 09:08 PM   #400
ahunt
Low-Rise Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 121
I just now read this thread or I would have responded sooner. Please email me if you have a question -- I don't read all the posts. angela@angelahunt.com

The Schafer construction on McKinney Avenue is a frustration for me. It is suburban, rather than urban, in its architecture and design, with front parking, narrow sidewalks, etc. Unfortunately, neither I nor District 14's Plan Commissioner have any say in what is built in this city UNLESS the builder is seeking a zoning change. If a builder like Schafer builds to the current zoning standards, we don't get any input. That is what happened in this case. The only minor change in zoning that was requested was made AFTER construction was completed, for an SUP for an awning over the banking drivethrough. The drivethrough was permitted by the current zoning for use of an ATM. We were able to use the leverage of the SUP request to prohibit left turns from the exit onto Maple (which would be unsafe and cause traffic problems). The SUP is not permanent (as requested) but only for 18 months, so if the awning causes a problem, it may not be renewed.

From what I've heard, Schafer and company were told ahead of time that this type of construction would not go over well in Uptown, but they went forward anyway. I appreciate investments in our city, but to me this construction at McKinney and Maple is a terrible example of bad suburban architecture plopped down in the middle of an urban area. It was a missed opportunity. Even keeping the architecture like it is, they could have pulled the building to the sidewalk, widened the sidewalk, and put the parking in the back. Just doing that would have created a much more attractive plaza, more consistent with the area.

When developers in Uptown talk with me about changing the zoning to accommodate their building "needs," among other things, I tell them that I want to see wide (10'+) sidewalks, not the tiny 3' sidewalks currently there. We need to encourage pedestrian-friendly development, and not continue to treat our pedestrian areas as an after-thought. I'm looking for new sidewalk regulations to be part of our comprehensive land-use plan.
ahunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
West End: Founders Plaza | JFK Memorial Plaza CTroyMathis Parks, Trails, + Misc. Infrastructure 291 04-28-2010 04:15 AM
Uptown: One Mckinney Plaza to be redone (w/ ground floor retail) MarkL2023 Urban Development 30 04-13-2010 09:26 AM
Uptown | Cityplace West: Unity Plaza jsoto3 Urban Development 33 03-23-2010 09:22 PM
Frisco Square Plaza CTroyMathis Suburban/Exurban/Regional Development 26 08-01-2008 07:36 AM
DFW Office Market GarrettCarey Archived Threads 1037 08-26-2007 09:51 PM

To the Top of the Metropolis


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 PM.


©2000 - 2010, vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©1997 - 2010 DallasMetropolis.com | PrairieCiti™ - 13th Aniversary
"In Urban Dallas, Urban Fort Worth, & Metropolitanism We Trust" - PrairieCiti Power & Lighting

Add to Google  Add to My Yahoo!  DFWU RSS Feed  DFWU SEO Archive