PDA

View Full Version : DART's Influence on Transit Oriented Development



dfwcre8tive
11 January 2008, 01:45 PM
Transit-oriented developments spring up near DART stops
11:13 AM CST on Friday, January 11, 2008
By STEVE BROWN / The Dallas Morning News
stevebrown@dallasnews.com
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/011108dnbustods.29812b1.html

Off Walnut Hill Lane in northeast Dallas, demolition crews are making quick work of a sprawling neighborhood of crummy apartments.

In place of the crime-ridden units, developers will soon put up an urban village centered around a new commuter rail station.

In years past, that Lake Highlands property might have wound up being used for just more apartments or a strip shopping center or even single-family homes.

But that was before developers caught on to the benefits of mass transit.

"One of the most important aspects of our overall project is having the ability to have mass transit in the development," said Vance Detwiler, managing director of Prescott Realty Group, which is building the new Lake Highlands Town Center. "In theory, you can build your projects more dense and have a little less parking."

In just over a decade since the commuter rail system opened in Dallas, real estate projects that have sprung up around some of the stations have gotten bigger and more complicated.

They are called transit-oriented developments, or TODs. And these projects are the real estate development's version of the iPod.

They are the hot gadget that's remaking the business of building retail, residential and commercial space.

Early TODs like Mockingbird Station and even West Village in Uptown showed developers that these complexes resonated with consumers.

The two newest such developments take the idea to the infinite degree.

The 33-acre Park Lane complex under construction adjacent to DART's Park Lane rail station will cost three-quarters of a billion dollars to complete.

The first phase of the mammoth mixed-use development will open later this year.

"Our grand opening will be in February of next year," said Tod Ruble, a co-founder of project developer Harvest Partners. "We will have the first tenants in the apartment towers by May of this year."

The high-rise complex going up across North Central Expressway from NorthPark Center shopping mall is one of the largest such developments in the country.

And Mr. Ruble said the project wouldn't be happening the way it is without the adjoining rail station.

"It's already come up several times in discussions with tenants about how attractive it will be to access the project through DART," he said. "As Dallas becomes more urban and people move back into the city, more of them are willing to ride the transit."

Park Lane will be a city in itself with more than 600 residential units – mostly in high-rise buildings – and 700,000 square feet of retail space and 816,000 square feet of office space. The Valencia Hotel, which is just getting under way, has been increased to 250 rooms.

And Harvest Partners is seeking tenants for a new office tower.

"We are working on plans for a 400,000-square-foot building right on the corner of Park and North Central," Mr. Ruble said.

DART's director of economic development and planning, Jack Wierzenski, said he isn't surprised to see that local TODs are getting bigger.

"It's just the maturity and the reality of the market," Mr. Wierzenski said. "The early ones were more of a let's-see-if-this-works."

And the impact of these projects are likely to spread beyond their boundaries.

"There is a ripple effect," Mr. Wierzenski said. "Mockingbird Station was seen as a success but now look at what's – even more – going on around it."

Lake Highlands homeowners who lobbied for Prescott Realty Group's project on Skillman Street also expect it to be a positive influence on the neighborhood.

The 70-acre development is expected to cost as much as $400 million and will include about 1,600 residences, 300,000 square feet of retail and about 100,000 square feet of office space. Almost 20 acres is being set aside for park and public space.

Crews are busy demolishing the old apartments to make way for the urban village.

"About 50 percent of the site is cleared," said Prescott Realty's Mr. Detwiler. "We have knocked down over 40 buildings.

"We will start moving dirt and putting in the streets and other infrastructure by May."

The first phase of Lake Highlands Town Center is to open late next year, he said.

"We are hopeful that the new DART station will be ready by late 2010 or early 2011," Mr. Detwiler said.

The addition of the transit stop to DART's existing Garland Line enabled the developers to seek zoning changes for more buildings for their project.

"In order to make redevelopment work in an urban area, you have to have additional density because of the costs," Mr. Detwiler said.


PARK LANE
Park Lane
Harvest Partners

•$750 million transit-oriented, mixed-use development

•U.S. Highway 75 and Park Lane

•Adjacent to Park Lane light-rail station

•33 acres

•700,000 square feet of retail

•816,000 square feet of office space

•250 hotel rooms

•78,000-square-foot fitness center

•625 residential units

•Developer: Harvest Partners



LAKE HIGHLANDS TOWN CENTER
Lake Highlands Town Center
Prescott Realty

•$400 million transit-oriented, mixed-use development

•Adjacent to new Lake Highlands light-rail station

•Walnut Hill Lane and Skillman Street

•70 acres

•300,000 square feet of retail

•100,000 square feet of office

•1,600 residential units

•20 acres of park and public space

•Developer: Prescott Realty Group

MarkL2023
21 August 2008, 03:06 PM
Moved from Adriataca Thread. This seemed to be the most appropriate... (We are talking about Mockingbird Station)

Originally Posted by ajackmeh16
^ A pain to park in? The point of TODs are to get people to use transit or walk...instead of using cars. So, having issues parking doesn't really matter.


So I'm supposed to ride the rail there? What If I'm one of the millions of people that don't live within walking distance of a rail station? It's a pain to park in and thats why I go to NorthPark instead. Next year you will hopefully hear a different story as I will hopefully be living in Republic Center.

When pitching a development, a developer analyzes demographics of the surrounding area that would have access to the shopping/dining/etc. A study was done that people are only willing to walk a maximum of ~14 blocks (though in Dallas I'm sure its like 4) before driving. With crummy parking, you limit yourself more to the 14-block surroundings when it comes to customers. With plentiful and convenient parking, you are able to attract customers from much further (I don't know how many miles/minutes though). It's simply in the best interest of the retail, restaurants and movie theater that there be convenient parking for potential customers. Some of you will argue I can park at a rail station and ride but my closest station is Mockingbird.

downtownguy25
21 August 2008, 05:30 PM
Originally Posted by ajackmeh16
^ A pain to park in? The point of TODs are to get people to use transit or walk...instead of using cars. So, having issues parking doesn't really matter.

.

What are you talking about "pain to park in". Just head for the massive underground parking garage, I have never had an issue finding a parking spot there. Its very easy to get in and out of, plus during the day your car stays cool and there are a ton of security cameras at night. The only complaint I have is there strings of compact car spots, the rest of the parking spots are large which is good cuz I drive an suv and suck at parking.

LH_Newbie
21 August 2008, 05:33 PM
Mockingbird's surface parking sucks, but they have a pretty darn big parking structure that is apparently not well marked, because it's always half empty (or is it half full?). I usually don't drive through the place as it's way too pedestrian oriented to drive in. Instead, I come in off of the service drive off of Central to the southern portion of the complex, into the parking structure. It's always quite easy to find a parking spot.

FoUTASportscaster
21 August 2008, 06:05 PM
Just a bit of clarity, Mockingbird Station has the same parking requirements that every other place in Dallas does. 1 space per bedroom, 3.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail. It has 24 residential units per acre.

Addison Circle, on the otherhand, was built in three phases and includes phase 1, 1.1 space per bedroom, phase 2, .03 spaces per, and phase three is 1 per. Overall, there are 100 units per acre. With less spaces, Addison Circle is denser than Mockingbird Station, from a residential point of view.

tamtagon
22 August 2008, 12:09 AM
So I'm supposed to ride the rail there? What If I'm one of the millions of people that don't live within walking distance of a rail station?

TODs have a critical mass threshold just like other kinds of developments. 10,000 residents is the golden number for the Dallas CBD since that's about how many "townsfolk" are needed to sustain a basic compliment of household-needs retail as well as neighborhood-oriented entertainment venues....

With Mockingbird Station, the critical mass threshold to consider involves the light rail system, at least from Richardson to the CBD. As touted as the design and intended purpose of Mockingbird Station has been since it opened, the usefullness of the development has not come close to its potential, none of the Red Line TODs or quasi-TODs have. The CBD residential population is more important to the vibrancy of Mockingbird Station than easy surface parking. By the time trains are rolling to Carrollton, Mockingbird Station and most other Red Line TODs will have more of that cool big city vibe, like Toronto.

FoUTASportscaster
22 August 2008, 11:09 AM
So I'm supposed to ride the rail there? What If I'm one of the millions of people that don't live within walking distance of a rail station?

There is the bus, which works well, not counting the frequency. If you haven't taken it, you should try at least twice before you make a judgement.

Random Traffic Guy
22 August 2008, 12:24 PM
Just a bit of clarity, Mockingbird Station has the same parking requirements that every other place in Dallas does. 1 space per bedroom, 3.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail. It has 24 residential units per acre.

Not quite, the parking ratios were negotiated during development, just as they are adjusted in many PDs. I have them as:
Residential 1.16 per Unit
Retail 1 Space per 250 SF (4 per 1,000 SF)
Office 1 Space per 333 SF (3 per 1,000 SF)
Hotel 1 Space per Room

You're off on Dallas too, basics requirements are:
Multifamily Residential – 1 space per 500 square feet, with a minimum of one space and maximum of two spaces per dwelling unit for buildings over 36 feet in height
Retail – 1 space per 200 square feet (5 per 1,000SF)
Office – 1 space per 333 square feet (3 per 1,000SF)

What any one site actually needs is another story.


And to answer the question of the topic, DART's influence on TOD can be summed up as generally NEGATIVE.
For actually working with them, DART is very difficult to deal with and has a stong touch of railway company syndrome [1]. Not only is it a seemingly impenetrable bureaucracy, but with a view of people or cars around their rails as being a bad thing. Possible signs of this changing, but not stongly.


[1] - for anyone who hasn't done work with them, the old-line railroads have huge amounts of power on their rights of way, due to their age and how they were set up. Therefore, they can tell almost anyone to go F&$$ themselves, and usually do when you try to do anything with them.

dfwcre8tive
28 August 2008, 01:17 PM
http://www.dart.org/about/inmotion/25anniversary/7.htm

Saturday, Oct. 25, hop aboard for Rail Life Tour 2008 – a special open house of apartment and condominium developments near DART Rail stations – from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. Come see what all the buzz is about as DART, Quick, Guide and some of our region's most visionary developers throw open their doors for a day of hospitality.

Register online, and then check in at one of the following rail stations anytime during the tour. For a nominal fee of $5 (a benefit for Habitat for Humanity), you'll get a DART Day Pass, a map of participating properties and businesses, a rail schedule, and some surprise goodies. Then take the tour at your own leisurely pace and enjoy the Rail Life experience.


RAIL LIFE TOUR Check-in Stations
• Parker Road Station
Archerwood, between Parker Road and East Park Blvd.

• Downtown Garland Station
Walnut Street at Fifth Street
(430 W. Walnut St.), downtown Garland

• Mockingbird Station
Mockingbird Lane, east of North Central Expressway
(5465 E. Mockingbird Lane), Dallas

• Akard Station
Pacific Avenue, (1401 Pacific Ave.) between Akard and Field streets, downtown Dallas

• Westmoreland Station
Illinois Avenue and Westmoreland Road (2646 S. Westmoreland Road), Dallas

• Ledbetter Station
Lancaster Road and Ledbetter Drive (2006 E. Ledbetter Drive), Dallas

For details, watch Quick and Guide, or visit www.DART.org.

CTroyMathis
09 March 2010, 06:59 PM
Related (or perhaps in need of new thread) :
http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2010/03/darts_hoping_to_generate_reven.php

MarkL2023
09 March 2010, 07:46 PM
http://www.bisnow.com/dallas-fort_worth_commercial_real_estate_news_story.php?p =7481

The article contains a bunch of facts about DART's expansion and the TODs that are developing as a result, but few will be new to anyone that follows this forum

Rodger Jones
12 March 2010, 03:59 PM
Advocates of DART's aggressive rail expansion, which it calls the most ambitious in North America, argue the theory that development will cluster along rail lines because people want to live nearby, park their cars and commute by train. A core objective is to improve the air. Plus, supporters say, rail boosts property values and thereby helps economic vitality.

My observation, from my daily commutes on the Red Line, is that TOD has been painfully slow to develop near DART stations. And I doubt anyone has data indicating whether nearby residents are indeed DART users.

Now comes an article in San Francisco's Fog City Journal, and referenced on the online site New Geography, that takes aim at TOD theory. It maintains development along San Francisco rail lines may have helped developers but hasn't changed commuting habits in ways that help the environment.

Quote from Fog City and a rundown of DART TOD here:

http://transportationblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2010/03/transit-oriented-development-a.html

dfwcre8tive
12 March 2010, 04:16 PM
That's a good post and you make good points about the lack of connections between stations and their surrounding neighborhoods. I've noticed that many times the only connection is a dirt path through a vacant lot. As the region continues to densify it is very important that developments include good pedestrian connections. Extending bike trails to stations (such as the planned White Rock Trail >> Forest Lane) will be important as well.

A lot of the stations had impressive development plans until the economy crashed. It will be interesting to see how the Lake Highlands Town Center (http://www.lakehighlandstowncenter.com/) (Lake Highlands Station) and Midtown Park (http://www.midtownpark.com) (Walnut Hill Station) impact TOD.

The Orange Line will be interesting to watch as well, since that corridor does not follow a previous freight rail line and will not have associated industrial complexes surrounding it.

bcstx06
12 March 2010, 09:51 PM
I have been wanting to ask this. Why isn't there a huge TOD around Cityplace station? if I was a developer, that would be the spot I would want to build at.

NThomas
13 March 2010, 12:10 PM
I have been wanting to ask this. Why isn't there a huge TOD around Cityplace station? if I was a developer, that would be the spot I would want to build at.
There is. It's call the West Village. Instead of working their way in from NCX, the development started on McKinney and developed towards NCX.

TheMapman
16 March 2010, 12:51 AM
Advocates of DART's aggressive rail expansion, which it calls the most ambitious in North America, argue the theory that development will cluster along rail lines because people want to live nearby, park their cars and commute by train. A core objective is to improve the air. Plus, supporters say, rail boosts property values and thereby helps economic vitality.

My observation, from my daily commutes on the Red Line, is that TOD has been painfully slow to develop near DART stations. And I doubt anyone has data indicating whether nearby residents are indeed DART users.

Now comes an article in San Francisco's Fog City Journal, and referenced on the online site New Geography, that takes aim at TOD theory. It maintains development along San Francisco rail lines may have helped developers but hasn't changed commuting habits in ways that help the environment.

Quote from Fog City and a rundown of DART TOD here:

http://transportationblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2010/03/transit-oriented-development-a.html

It's generally a good article but he's right at the end when he says he's just not being patient enough. Easy developments can take 2-3 years to come together in a good economy - mixed-use, high-density TOD projects require much more complex financing and significantly more difficult approvals to come to fruition. Banks didn't have an easy way of assessing the viability of the projects, designers didn't know how to put them together, retailers didn't know how to approach them....it's been a feeling-out process for everyone in Dallas. And it continues to be.

As for commuting habits, that is going to be a 20+ year process, if not longer. It took that long for the automobile to become the widely preferred choice and as DART continues to build a more multimodal network, particularly with the Green and Orange lines and D2, the rail line will access more areas than ever.

Bottom line: patience.


I have been wanting to ask this. Why isn't there a huge TOD around Cityplace station? if I was a developer, that would be the spot I would want to build at.

Actually goes to my above point - the prime land for the CityPlace Station will be developed last at the highest density - the existing West Village and CityPlace developments are merely setting the stage for that project. And this is good urban planning / real estate economics - save the best land for the best opportunity. The roads across the old Hank Haney site should be going in sometime in the next two years to prepare for that next development step.