PDA

View Full Version : MovieMaker 2004 Top 10 Cities for Moviemakers: H-Town #10 Austin #1



MontroseHood
18 February 2004, 07:39 PM
MovieMaker 2004 Top 10 Cities for Moviemakers

Our fourth annual ranking of the best places in the US to live and make movies

When the new year rolls around at MovieMaker it means two things to our staff: the annual Park City issue had better be at the printer and our annual countdown of America’s top 10 moviemaking havens better be part of the editorial mix.

Based on way too much research and statistical analysis as well as numerous conversations with local film offices and individual moviemakers, this 2004 list contains several of the usual suspects—but several surprises, too.

Over the years, we’ve witnessed the effect a changing economy has on location-based film production. When budgets need to be cut, state-funded film offices are often the first to suffer. Los Angeles and Chicago have felt the strain this year, which is reflected in their rankings. At the same time, Boston, a city without an official film office, is making its first appearance, offering a true rags-to-riches story.

But the biggest story of the year has to do with things really being bigger in Texas—Austin and Houston, to be exact. Complementing each other’s efforts, the two Southwestern cities are turning the state into a moviemaking powerhouse, and bookend our list of picks.

Moviemaking is not an exact science. Just as there is no formula that will automatically calculate the box office success of a film, or what an actor is really worth to a picture, there is no one correct answer on which city is right for every moviemaker. It all comes down to personality, and making sure that yours matches the climate and attitude of the city you’re living in. Luckily, there’s a bit of something for everyone on this list—and that should make the task of finding the perfect base for a blissful moviemaking career a bit easier.

1. Austin, Texas Last year: #4

If it’s not careful, austin may wake up one day to discover it’s become the new Mecca of American moviemaking. Or has that day already arrived? Inching up on our list for four years in a row, it seemed only a matter of time before the City of the Violet Crown wrangled the top spot. What’s so amazing is that Austin is still in its indie film production infancy, at least compared to long-established moviemaking megalopolises like Los Angeles and New York.

In 2003 the city had its “biggest year ever,” says Gary Bond, director of the Austin Film Office. Austin hosted six major feature films last year with budgets totaling more than $200 million, including Alan Parker’s The Life of David Gale, Marcus Nispel’s The Texas Chainsaw Massacre and The Alamo, which reteamed director John Lee Hancock and actor Dennis Quaid, who worked together on The Rookie in Austin the previous year.

According to Bond, film production has increased “tenfold” over the past decade in Austin. In large part this is because the
city’s advantages have drawn moviemakers back to town again and again—and because the city is home to some of the most recognizable names in the business, like indie auteurs Robert Rodriguez and Richard Linklater.

“Austin’s diverse locations and deep pool of crew and talent are the main reasons the city’s a favorite of independent producers,” says Bond. This seems to be the consensus among local moviemakers as well. “You can almost always get free labor here. But beware: the free labor is usually friendly and intelligent,” warns producer-director Damon “Tuscany” Chang.

The local film community also agrees that the Austin Film Office does a more than competent job of helping moviemakers. Besides performing the obligatory duties, the Austin Film Office also assists moviemakers with housing needs, sponsors crew appreciation events and provides welcome packets that include information on the city, T-shirts and CDs of local musicians. (The Austin music scene, of course, is one of the richest in the world.)

The office also works closely with a number of local organizations to help encourage and foster local film production. The Austin Film Society, for example, provides grants to local moviemakers, sponsors screenings and serves as the property manager of the city-owned Austin Studios (which features 20 acres of film and video production facilities, including a 10,000 square-foot production office building and 100,000 square feet of production space).

Besides hosting educational and networking events, the Texas Association of Film and Tape Professionals lobbies for film-friendly legislation. The Chamber of Commerce Film and Digital Entertainment Committee is working to develop a stronger film-related city infrastructure.

Austin also boasts two major film festivals, South by Southwest and the Austin Film Festival—both of which emphasize locally-produced work. According to Mel Rodriguez, writer-director of Mockingbird, “The Austin Film Festival is one of the most informative and well-organized festivals in the country.”

Austin is geographically diverse, and rife with aesthetic appeal. It provides moviemakers with a variety of looks, all within a relatively small area—from grassy flatlands and rivers to deserts and hills. Although according to Chang, Austin “Can’t give you a true downtown or metropolitan city feel,” what it can give you is a slew of surrounding small towns, a number of which are great for period pieces; others are ideal for representing Any Town, USA.

With every up-and-coming movie town, however, there are growing pains. “The lack of choice with regard to production houses for film developing and transfers is generating more and more discussion around town,” says Chang. Also, according to local director-cinematographer Michael Morlan, “Austin is, for the most part, a nice place to live—though recent growth has found the city unprepared and, as such, construction and traffic are ridiculous.”

Financially speaking, Austin has additional benefits, like no permits being required to shoot in the city. “Along with the tax incentives available to filmmakers, we offer free or greatly reduced housing rates for location scouts and decision-makers considering Austin,” says Bond. “And frequently, city facilities and property are available at no charge to filmmakers.” According to Chang, “A local filmmaker can live (rent, food, other expenses) for about $800 a month.” Sounds like a city that may just keep growing.

Austin Film Office * 201 E 2nd Street, Austin, TX 78701 * 512/583-7299 * www.austintexas.org

10. Houston, TX Last year: Unranked

Bookending our list with Austin, Space City completes our dynamic Texas duo. In fact, it may be only a matter of time until Houston is not just complementing its Texas sister, but rivaling it. Regardless of its place on the list, Houston is helping Texas become a major American moviemaking hub.

As the fourth largest city in the U.S., Houston has plenty of room for shooting—and further growth. Culturally and geographically diverse, the city has doubled for locations around the world, including New York, Los Angeles, St. Louis, Miami and even Cuba. And it’s as easy to make movies in Houston as it is to live. According to Film Office director Rick Ferguson, “Through November of 2003, we’ve logged 131 projects, 550 shooting days and $23 million in production. These figures also represent only projects we have taken an active part in, and represent probably 60 percent of the production that has taken place in the city.”

Houston boasts the Texas Filmmakers Showcase, a special screening event consisting of the best of Texas-made shorts. Chosen movies—and moviemakers—are sent to Los Angeles to screen their work (and network) with studio executives, agents and producers. Additional screening opportunities include the Worldfest International Film Festival as well as the Aurora Picture House, a local gem that Surface magazine labeled “The most innovative outlet for vanguard filmmakers deep in the heart of Texas.”

If you need further incentive to choose Texas, try tax-free equipment and services. Anything necessary for the production of a commercial project is free of state or local sales tax. Also, there are no permits required to shoot in Houston, and productions are exempt from paying hotel tax after 30 days.

The Texas movie scene is hot; it looks like the Lone Star State will be hosting a number of stars for years to come. MM

Houston Film Office * 901 Bagby, Suite 100, Houston, TX 77002 * 713/227-3100 * http://filmhouston.texaswebhost.com

bloodandpopcorn
18 February 2004, 11:01 PM
Not surpising that Movie Maker listed them there - it is based in Houston, after all, and always seems to have a bias towards Texas production. I'm a big opponant of them, though, because when I was serving as director of photography on my friend's set in Dallas, they would NOT list us under "current productions" because we couldn't "prove that we existed." And I've never dealt with people so rude. I had a subscription for a year, then they called me, yelled at me, and tried to charge me twice the next year. I gave them the equivillant of the finger and have never looked back again.

I'd love it if Austin were #1 for moviemaking, but as an industry insider, unless there's alot of crap going on way under the radar (and, then, it's probably not terribly important work), Austin would be lucky to make it into the top 5 nationally. It's a great little city, and there are alot of intellegent, liberal-minded, artistic people there - but its not chucking out that much. And most of the local independent film is quite mediocre. Dallas doesn't have hardly any big stuff any more, but we have some of the most talented short filmmakers and some of the most inventive no-budget movie's I've ever seen. Primer just won at Sundance, for god's sake.

Anyway, Houston is often underranked for film stuff, I think. It was big when Dallas was big, but, unlike Dallas, it's film scene never faded. Austin seems big because it kind of shot up out of no where, but it really doesn't have that much more note worthy stuff than Houston.

bloodandpopcorn
18 February 2004, 11:03 PM
Wow, this is quite odd. Looking at MovieMaker's website, it appears they're based out of NYC now. They were defintely Houston-based not too long ago, though.