PDA

View Full Version : Apartment boom hits Las Colinas



psukhu
03 August 2003, 02:11 PM
Apartment boom hits Las Colinas
1,300 units going up by '05

Christine Perez
Senior writer

After a decade of scant multifamily development in the area, four companies are speeding ahead with apartment projects in the urban center of Las Colinas, a sprawling 12,000-acre masterplanned community in Irving.

The projects will add a whopping 1,300 units to the community over the next two years.

Three of the four developments are on the east side of Lake Carolyn, an area recently opened up by the completion of Lake Carolyn Parkway, a split-lane road that will eventually surround a Dallas Area Rapid Transit light-rail line.

"The urban center was always intended to be a 24-hour environment, but we've never had the rooftops," said Bobby Stewart, vice president at Cousins Properties, which serves as development manager for Las Colinas. "There is a pent-up demand, and now that the infrastructure is in place, we've made a few multifamily land sales."

United Dominion Realty snapped up 7.3 acres at the southwest end of Lake Carolyn Parkway and will begin construction on a 370-unit complex during the first quarter of 2004. Billingsley Co. closed last week on 5.3 acres just to the north on the east side of the street, with plans to build 270 units.

The Hanover Co., a Houston-based developer, has already begun work on The Lofts at Las Colinas, a four-story, 341-unit complex on 5.3 acres at Lake Carolyn Parkway and O'Connor Boulevard. The apartments will range in size from 750 to 1,550 square feet, said Ed Hamilton, development partner at Hanover.

"This project is not similar to anything in that market right now," he said. "It's patterned after one of our Houston projects called The Lofts at the Ballpark, which has a 9,000-square-foot clubhouse, a demonstration kitchen, 32-seat theater and cybercafe, conference center and two pools."

The Lofts at Las Colinas is the first Irving project for Hanover, which also owns Churchill on the Park in Dallas and The Lodge at Frisco Bridges in Frisco. Hamilton said the company was attracted to the urban center's high-end environment.

"It had a lot of things we look for, the concentration of the office sector and the access to retail," he said. "We like that it's a masterplanned area, that it's on the lake and the fact that we'll have rail coming in at some point. It costs more to be in Las Colinas, but the future is better for the property."

The fourth new project in Las Colinas will be developed by Palladium USA, the American affiliate of Palladium International Inc., based in Milan, Italy.

It will be adjacent to the only residential high-rise in Las Colinas, Grand Treviso, which Palladium finished last year.

The 17-story, $47 million Grand Treviso project is 90% leased, said Spencer Stuart, chief operating officer for Palladium.

"It's going well, considering the state of the economy," he said. "We've always liked and believed in the strength of the market in the urban center of Las Colinas."

Units in Grand Treviso range in size from 730 square feet to 3,070 square feet and in price from $895 per month to $6,615 per month. Those in the mid-rise segment of the development, which encircle the high-rise portion, are 99% leased.

Construction will get under way before year's end on Palladium's newest endeavor: Lofts Canal Side. The four-story project will be next to Grand Treviso at the southeast corner of Las Colinas Boulevard and Windgren Boulevard.

"Our success with the mid-rise buildings in Grand Treviso has given us confidence that a new project would also be successful," Stuart said.

Two sides of the complex will run along Mandalay Canal, the waterway that meanders through the urban center of Las Colinas. Amenities will include pedestrian access to the canal, restaurants and retail, along with a "spectacular" pool complex and garden retreat, Stuart said.

Underserved submarket
Kevin McGlaun, vice president at Cousins Properties, said the four multifamily projects will offer relief for area workers.

"We've got 100,000 people working here and only about 25,000 who live here," he said. "Of those who live here, probably less than half of them work here, so 90% of our daytime population is commuting out of Las Colinas every day."

"There have probably been only 1,500 units built here in the last eight to 10 years, because the infrastructure wasn't in place to allow it," McGlaun added. "Demand has never been the problem."

Still, the four new projects come at a time when the Metroplex apartment industry is struggling, with average rents falling 3.4% over the past 12 months and occupancy dropping to 90.2%, according to a recent report from M/PF Research Inc.

"Las Colinas has been proportionately underserved over the last several years, but I don't think there is pent-up demand anywhere at this point," said Greg Willett, director of research at M/PF.

The Dallas-Fort Worth market saw 12,300 new units delivered for the 12 months ended June 30, 2003, more than doubling the demand figure of 4,560.

Las Colinas performed better than other submarkets. Its mid-year occupancy of 92.5% was the best suburban performance in the Metroplex, and average rents remained stable.

"Compared to the overall market, there's a pretty big difference in performance there," Willett said. "I'd have a hard time defending a new multifamily project in Dallas right now, but if it is to happen, Las Colinas is a logical choice."

Contact DBJ writer Christine Perez at cperez@bizjournals.com or (214) 706-7120.



© 2003 American City Business Journals Inc.

rantanamo
03 August 2003, 04:33 PM
Cool, I'm definitely a Las Colinas Urban Center fan since visiting for the first time last summer. Love the downtown skyline shot on News 8 that looks down 114 and past Las Colinas. Almost like another city. Tons of potential for urban development. I think what is there already is excellent, but needed more people. I hope these new developlements along the shores are very dense and non garden-style like those on the western shore. I have no doubts about the palladium project, as the Grand Travieso looks awesome. Did they also do the residential tower across from the Galleria?

CTroyMathis
04 August 2003, 02:37 PM
Good info in this article. I've been waiting to hear when the 'next step' would be taken in the UC. Rantanamo, yeah they also did The Verona by the Galleria.

CTroyMathis
04 August 2003, 02:45 PM
Here's an old log of info from the TAMU site that blabs much to do about Tx real estate (basically the same thing though):

1/2/2003 Business area changing with housing boom
A planning overlay of the Las Colinas urban center allows a maximum of 4,910 units of single-family homes and apartments. In another area north of the urban center, Planned Unit Development No. 4, a maximum of 6,000 units are allowed -- 4,000 apartments and 2,000 single-family homes. Plans for that area also include parks, a retail center and at least one school in the Carrollton-Farmers Branch school district. Site work has begun on the 197-acre La Villita project near the intersection of Royal lane and O'Conner Road. This development will include 2,100 multi-family units, 225 single-family homes and 80 townhouses. Also approved in Las Colinas is the Mandalay on the Lake development, bringing in 369 units. Still in the early stages are the Las Colinas lofts (341 units), Canalside (304 units) and an unnamed JPI project (760 units).

patmns
05 August 2003, 12:30 PM
"The Dallas-Fort Worth market saw 12,300 new units delivered for the 12 months ended June 30, 2003, more than doubling the demand figure of 4,560."

That is an interesting figure from Christine Perez's article in the Dallas Business Journal. If I am reading that correct, there should be a little less than 7800 new apartments in the metroplex sitting empty.

I know the article says that Las Colinas is hot with over 92% occupancy right now, but adding another 1300 units to the area seems a bit much.

I would love to see the new apartments go up, but I don't know how business savy the decision to build that many more units might be.

I personally live in an apartment, so I invite more new construction. The added competition keeps the prices low and the move in specials high.

What I am not looking foward to is the day when new development drys up, because these apartment companies are still trying to fill the buildings that they are all throwing up. The city could go through several years without any new apartment designs.

Just my 2 cents

psukhu
05 August 2003, 12:48 PM
I think it is cheaper to over build now because of the current low financing rates for developers. The break even occupancy rate becomes lower because of the reduced financing costs. (Many of these developments are financed with 40 year loans.)

The large supply keeps the prices down at the current demand level. $1 per sq ft for apartments keeps DFW competitive with smaller metros. (you know those, ‘best cities’ lists)

DFW will add over a million residents from 2000 to 2010.

Quiz03
05 August 2003, 12:48 PM
aprtment construction is usually boom or bust. Everyone sees that there is a need for the new construction so several different companies take advantage of favorable interest rates and start construction completely disregarding what other apartments are going up. After this boom I would expect a trickle of units to come online in most submarkets. The ones already in the pipelin will be built to take advantage of the interest rates, but speculative construction should slowuntil the next boom whenever that will be.

rantanamo
05 August 2003, 01:04 PM
Originally posted by psukhu


DFW will add over a million residents from 2000 to 2010.

Very important fact that can't be overlooked. They all can't live in suburban homes either. Also must realize the unknown illegal immigration and migration numbers that could boom even more. I guess I read developments with more of a sociological or demographic eye than through an investor's eye. Remember they are concerned more about the money in the now on their end. As a region though, for many of the reasons stated above, it's advantageous to have plenty of competition as well as stay a little ahead of the population.

CTroyMathis
19 May 2004, 07:41 PM
Here's some renderings found online.

gc
07 June 2004, 11:18 AM
Palladium Rolls Out Buy/Build Plan
By Connie Gore - June 7, 2004 11:23am
http://www.globest.com/news/46_46/dallas/123183-1.html

DALLAS-With a new president and CEO at the helm, Palladium USA International Inc. is poised for the first plays of a multifaceted expansion plan in Dallas/Fort Worth. The initial thrust begins with July's groundbreaking on a $32-million project in the Las Colinas Urban Center and the formation of a property management group while the long-term plan is to buy for the first time since 1993.
"With this renewed business model, we hope it's going to give us seven to 10 very good years in Dallas," Thomas E. Huth, Palladium USA's new quarterback, tells GlobeSt.com. "There are a lot of opportunities in our backyard and we want to stay focused on that."

The lead-off play is the 306-unit groundbreaking for Lofts Canal Side, a neighbor to Palladium's 98%-leased, 246-unit Grand Treviso, which opened in 2002 at 330 E. Las Colinas Blvd. The Lofts Canal Side, set to rise with a separate identity and style on five acres, will build out Palladium's land holdings in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex. Land and existing class B-plus product, both with high visibility and value-add ops, will be part of the buying scenario. Meanwhile, Huth says the USA group's first property management exec--and one skilled in acquisitions as well--will be in place within 90 days. Lofts Canal Side's first units will deliver in a year, about six months ahead of the construction completion. Units will average 906 sf; median rent, $1.30 per sf.

As for the buying plan, Palladium USA's Huth expects to acquire 1,000 to 2,500 units per year in the $60,000 to $75,000 per door range for properties with 250 to 300 apartments--first in North Texas and then Austin and San Antonio. "We want to go into town, make a significant impact and then go onto another city," he explains. The firm first bought in 1991, sold the 400 Dallas units and bought again two years later. The 268-unit Bristlecone at 2600 Preston Rd. in Plano is the only property in the 1,000-apartment portfolio, valued at slightly more than $100 million, that wasn't built by Palladium. Huth, who's on the prowl for additional partner groups, says the buying spree will be funded with US and European capital. The buying pool, he says, "is unlimited to the extent that I can find good deals."

zigwamo
07 June 2004, 11:44 AM
I think Las Colinas will really boom when rail gets to it.

tamtagon
07 June 2004, 01:54 PM
Me too. Las Colinas stands to gain the most from double expansions of the airport and DART.

Lakewooder
07 June 2004, 10:06 PM
Um, Palladium -- aren't they the ones who decamped from Victory ostensibly for economic difficulties?

gc
07 June 2004, 11:18 PM
No, this is a different Palladium Lakewooder.

sogod
08 June 2004, 09:09 PM
In a way I am actually disappointed by the apartments being built in Las Colinas... the empty land they are being built on would be perfect for mid-rises or high-rises. I felt the same way about the development proposed by that RTKL study for the area (relating to the forthcoming rail line). It seems to me building anything under 7-8 stories in the area should be discouraged or disallowed, but that report made it sound like the entire north end of the center should be mostly 2-3 story buildings. Wasted potential...

Anyways, I shouldn't be grumpy. The apartments being built are nice I am sure and will help the area alot, and the rail line still seems to be about a decade off.



In related news, the parking garage for the apartments on the south-east side of the lake were started a week or so ago.

gc
09 June 2004, 12:35 AM
I agree sogod. Las Colinas represents the perfect opportunity for multiple mid/highrise residential developments. In fact, I am surprised that 2-3 story buildings are not being discouraged, given that Las Colinas is/was a masterplanned urban community. Yes, it is certainly an opportunity lost.

rantanamo
09 June 2004, 01:24 AM
2-3 story buildings? What are you guys talking about?

sogod
09 June 2004, 01:16 PM
2-3 story buildings? What are you guys talking about?
Well, the report didn't say the entire north section. But a large chunk of it. :)

Northwest Corridor Las Colinas Land Use Study (http://www.ci.irving.tx.us/LandUseStudy/)

In the section on the north urban center:

Streetscape and Building Forms

The street framework and overall building massing continues the gridded pattern established in the South Urban Center but in a less dense fashion. Mid-rise buildings are envisioned around the station area, along West Las Colinas Boulevard and along Northwest Highway. 2 to 3-story residential buildings would face Hackberry Creek and the zone between the station and West Las Colinas Boulevard.


This just seems crazy to me. I don't know how much of the report the city actually took to heart, so I can't say for sure whether or not they are encouraging low-rise development. I am just saying that this report made the wrong call here.

rantanamo
09 June 2004, 01:52 PM
One thing to remember about this area though, is what has taken place since this report. The North Urban Center area is where Irving proposes their Jerry World site would be. It is also possibly going to be where the put a convention center and large hotel if they don't get Jerry World.

crescentboi
09 June 2004, 04:54 PM
Well if I remember correctly the Urban Center WAS against low rise buildings for a long time, but that's also why there wasn't any construction for what, a decade almost, then slowly came the Marriot then the Grand Treviso. The original plan was to have that area be strictly mid/highrise buildings and then the area south of 114 to Northgate being residential with single family or garden apartments with some office and retail intermixed. I guess they are so desperate for development that they're allowing almost anything at this point.

Quiz03
09 June 2004, 05:07 PM
2-3 story buildings are cheap so when the market desires more expensive, or extensive options high and midrise buildings can be built on these building's footprint by tearing them down.

freewaytincan
09 June 2004, 06:12 PM
2-3 story buildings are cheap so when the market desires more expensive, or extensive options high and midrise buildings can be built on these building's footprint by tearing them down.

As if that'll happen.

rantanamo
09 June 2004, 08:44 PM
I'm more for what they are doing. It's not like LC is Uptown. There's a lot of land, and they are doing things in a more dense than they have to manor. There will be a natural progression taller like Uptown is seeing rather than the highrise boom, then nothing for years like LC and Downtown saw. Anyways, any doubts that Las Colinas can support highrise living should be quelled by the Grand Treviso and that 98% occupancy. I think we'll see more. Just wait for DART and a possible Cowboys venue(all I can do is prey that this is as far as the Cowboys get away now).

freewaytincan
09 June 2004, 09:02 PM
I'm more for what they are doing. It's not like LC is Uptown. There's a lot of land, and they are doing things in a more dense than they have to manor. There will be a natural progression taller like Uptown is seeing rather than the highrise boom, then nothing for years like LC and Downtown saw. Anyways, any doubts that Las Colinas can support highrise living should be quelled by the Grand Treviso and that 98% occupancy. I think we'll see more. Just wait for DART and a possible Cowboys venue(all I can do is prey that this is as far as the Cowboys get away now).

I hope Jerry doesn't ruin Las Colinas. Just remodel Texas Stadium. Slimy, sleazy bastards get dirty old stadiums, as far as I'm concerned!

rantanamo
10 June 2004, 03:49 AM
^I'm hoping they aren't looking at that Tom Landry hat idea.

Lakewooder
10 June 2004, 09:05 PM
Just how is Irving going to come up with $425,000,000 ?

Foucault
10 June 2004, 09:45 PM
Exactly. That's the question I've been asking. If the Cowboys want $425 million, and Dallas can't afford to give it to them, not a city in Texas can.

freewaytincan
11 June 2004, 05:39 AM
Exactly. That's the question I've been asking. If the Cowboys want $425 million, and Dallas can't afford to give it to them, not a city in Texas can.

Hey, maybe Austin wants a pro football team? I'd do anything to get Jerry out of here. Even run down Elm naked. You wouldn't want to see that.